Not MUTT but MV

A place to post pics and descriptions of ongoing restoration projects

Moderators: rickf, raymond, Mr. Recovery

Post Reply
Hambone
Brigadier General
Brigadier General
Posts: 2506
Joined: October 1st, 2010, 12:19 am
Location: El Dorado, Arkansas

Not MUTT but MV

Unread post by Hambone » January 16th, 2014, 9:21 pm

I know this is not a 151 but I thought I would show you guys what I have been working on. 1954 GMC M211, just went through the brakes, water pump, changed trans fluid(16
qts.) runs like a top. Been experimenting with paint, about to throw the OD Green to her. Hambone
Image

User avatar
Horst
Colonel
Colonel
Posts: 1962
Joined: December 9th, 2007, 6:21 am
Location: Munich, Germany

Re: Not MUTT but MV

Unread post by Horst » January 17th, 2014, 3:20 am

very nice !!
Horst

1972 USMC M151A2 w/ROPS (ex Barstow) and M416
1962 M201 and trailer
1966 GTO,1982 E350 Skoolie, 1987 SJ413, 1987 911
Gone: 2xM35A2c, Unimog 404S, Hanomag AL28, DKW Munga

User avatar
rickf
General
General
Posts: 19765
Joined: November 26th, 2007, 1:28 pm
Location: Pemberton, NJ.

Re: Not MUTT but MV

Unread post by rickf » January 17th, 2014, 7:47 am

I came real close to buying one of them many years ago. Back then 4 MPG wasn't all that bad. :lol: :lol:
1964 M151A1
1984 M1008
1967 M416
04/1952 M100
12/1952 M100- Departed
AN/TSQ-114A Trailblazer- Gone

User avatar
mrdibbles
Colonel
Colonel
Posts: 1720
Joined: November 25th, 2007, 9:51 pm

Re: Not MUTT but MV

Unread post by mrdibbles » January 17th, 2014, 8:15 am

Very cool Hambone. Please pot more photos as this progresses. Looks like a lot of fun.
1992 Mercedes-Benz 250GD Wolf - Former German Army
St. Augustine, Florida

Hambone
Brigadier General
Brigadier General
Posts: 2506
Joined: October 1st, 2010, 12:19 am
Location: El Dorado, Arkansas

Re: Not MUTT but MV

Unread post by Hambone » January 17th, 2014, 8:19 pm

Yep, you're right, about 4mpg but I've been running casing head gas in it. I have access to drums of it, put 10 gals. in it 2 months ago, have about 5 left in it. I drive it around on the farm a little but haven't got it out on the road yet. Now that I have the brakes working, I'm ready to give it a smoke test. The county owned the truck and it was used until 1991 so it is in relatively good shape. Was worried about the auto trans. but it shifts out fine.

User avatar
rickf
General
General
Posts: 19765
Joined: November 26th, 2007, 1:28 pm
Location: Pemberton, NJ.

Re: Not MUTT but MV

Unread post by rickf » January 17th, 2014, 8:26 pm

There was an issue with the transmissions in them and I am trying to remember what it is. I want to say it had something to do with the shifter and there was a modified shifter for them. I am sure it is on the SS site on their early deuce page.
1964 M151A1
1984 M1008
1967 M416
04/1952 M100
12/1952 M100- Departed
AN/TSQ-114A Trailblazer- Gone

Hambone
Brigadier General
Brigadier General
Posts: 2506
Joined: October 1st, 2010, 12:19 am
Location: El Dorado, Arkansas

Re: Not MUTT but MV

Unread post by Hambone » January 17th, 2014, 8:42 pm

I have read the good and the bad about them, some say they're good some say they suck. They make a shift kit for them available from Memphis Equip. but the big thing is not to use reverse in high range. They first used 30w motor oil in them but mine has been running tranny fluid for years. Hope it holds out, truck only has 11,000 miles on it but its 60 yrs. old also.

old dodge guy
Sergeant First Class
Sergeant First Class
Posts: 200
Joined: December 23rd, 2013, 11:35 pm
Location: far----far northwest Missouri

Re: Not MUTT but MV

Unread post by old dodge guy » February 6th, 2014, 12:58 pm

Those are a good truck, but the transmission can be problematic. DO NOT let it shift hard under load!!! :!: Mine shifts great 1 to2 and 3 to 4, but the 2 to 3 shift I have to "baby" especial under large load. What I do is (once you know how it shifts) is to let the engine get to the point it would generally shifts, and let up on the pedal just before it does shift. A bit tricky, but once you get the "feel" it works well. Stay out of high reverse unless it is a real easy pull, for 99% of the time use low reverse. I have used ATF for over 30 years, no trouble from the fluid. I have had the replace/repair several transmissions through the years, but not the oils fault.......but mine. :shock: But then......we were also hauling 400 + bushels of corn or soybeans. Gross vehicle weights of 40,000 to 45,000 pounds. Been very happy with it over all, but it IS slow. LOL
Still crazy after all these years.
The OD bug bit me in 1970......and I have never been the same

Hambone
Brigadier General
Brigadier General
Posts: 2506
Joined: October 1st, 2010, 12:19 am
Location: El Dorado, Arkansas

Re: Not MUTT but MV

Unread post by Hambone » February 7th, 2014, 10:09 pm

Can't wait to get her painted and the bed back on, I think this is the best looking deuce they had.

Hambone
Brigadier General
Brigadier General
Posts: 2506
Joined: October 1st, 2010, 12:19 am
Location: El Dorado, Arkansas

Re: Not MUTT but MV

Unread post by Hambone » October 10th, 2015, 10:25 am

I have found out 1/4 ton vs. 2 1/2 ton equals 10 times the work :lol: , I think I will stick with the 1/4 tons, thought I would give an update, I have a little more painting left but am getting close, hope you guys don't mind me posting some updates, I know it's not a 151. Hambone
Image
Image

Image
Image

Post Reply