Hood Gap Issues

This is the place to get help with technical matters concerning your M151 jeep

Moderators: rickf, raymond, Mr. Recovery

Badgerord
Sergeant
Sergeant
Posts: 52
Joined: February 13th, 2015, 12:24 am
Location: Kansas City MO
Contact:

Re: Hood Gap Issues

Unread post by Badgerord » April 7th, 2017, 11:32 pm

Hi,

Is it the hood that came off the Mutt or a replacement, sorry didn't read every post.

I have purchased 2 NOS hoods that are just like the one you have, gap wise that is.

The Hoods I took off the Mutts fit much closer but were dented to heck, hence the replacement.

I have purchased several NOS Mutt parts that are probably NOS because they are out of spec! And thats probably why they are out there.

One test to make would be measure the hood from the bottom across the top to the far bottom and get a running linear measurement to compare to goods that fit better.
Marty
Badger Ordnance
1979 M151A2 Marine FAV, AMG
1979 M151A2 Barstow, NEW AMG
1973 M718A1 Ambulance, AMG
1972 M151A2 AMG
1971 M151A2 AMG Gone but not forgotten
1972 M151A2 AMG
1971 M35A2 AMG
1986 M1044 AMG
1968 M146

User avatar
rickf
General
General
Posts: 19762
Joined: November 26th, 2007, 1:28 pm
Location: Pemberton, NJ.

Re: Hood Gap Issues

Unread post by rickf » April 8th, 2017, 8:45 am

I suggested that but never got any response with measurements. One of the other members sent his measurements of his older hood that way.
1964 M151A1
1984 M1008
1967 M416
04/1952 M100
12/1952 M100- Departed
AN/TSQ-114A Trailblazer- Gone

User avatar
m3a1
Lt. General
Lt. General
Posts: 4039
Joined: August 7th, 2014, 6:36 pm

Re: Hood Gap Issues

Unread post by m3a1 » April 8th, 2017, 10:48 am

Yes, I felt the absolutely best way to do it would be to measure it linearly but Rick's method (which I used to provide measurements) is equally valid. If he doesn't have a cloth tape measure it would be just as simple to take a piece of string, lay it over, mark it with a sharpie and lay it out flat and measure it.

If there are indeed out of spec hoods out there :shock: it would be a good idea to get measurements posted for what is considered IN SPEC.

Given the protracted process for making these hoods, I cannot imagine how they could accidentally be created too short. (A more learned member such as Guy might have a comment about that.) Could it be that "shorties" were created as a solution, rather than truly being out of spec? By way of example, if through rough use, a M151's body gets tweaked a little and by that I mean just enough to put the hood down on the fender tops, there are really only three solutions. Write it off, put it on a frame straightening machine (and it isn't bloody likely the military kept many of those laying about) or go for a shorter hood and put it back into service. This is all complete theory, of course and the acid test of that theory would be that a shorty hood would have a part number and that would be listed somewhere.

Cheers,
TJ

User avatar
rickf
General
General
Posts: 19762
Joined: November 26th, 2007, 1:28 pm
Location: Pemberton, NJ.

Re: Hood Gap Issues

Unread post by rickf » April 8th, 2017, 6:30 pm

If it got bent up to hit the hood then it was really crashed and junk anyway but other than that if there was an interference they just hit it with a hammer, interference gone. I can see Seabee chiming in on this anytime now, I mentioned using a hammer. :roll: :twisted:
1964 M151A1
1984 M1008
1967 M416
04/1952 M100
12/1952 M100- Departed
AN/TSQ-114A Trailblazer- Gone

hondo100
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
Posts: 142
Joined: December 21st, 2014, 8:40 am
Location: Harvest, AL

Re: Hood Gap Issues

Unread post by hondo100 » April 10th, 2017, 7:21 am

I hope to get pictures and measurements up tonight. Thanks to everyone who has chimed in.

Ralph

Post Reply