the "miracle" venturi

This is the place to get help with technical matters concerning your M151 jeep

Moderators: rickf, raymond, Mr. Recovery

Post Reply
User avatar
Horst
Colonel
Colonel
Posts: 1962
Joined: December 9th, 2007, 6:21 am
Location: Munich, Germany

the "miracle" venturi

Unread post by Horst » April 19th, 2008, 10:47 am

Some time ago I bought for an insane amount of money the modified venturi for the Zenith carburetor (mil-plus). This is how it looks like:
Image

Now I tried it out in an average to good running take-out carb. What I got after the modification is an average to good running Zenith carburetor. I am not really sure if something improved considerably. Anybody tried that conversion? I had read, also on this board, that some people had bought the complete carbs from mil-plus. Would be interested what they say about before and after.
Horst

1972 USMC M151A2 w/ROPS (ex Barstow) and M416
1962 M201 and trailer
1966 GTO,1982 E350 Skoolie, 1987 SJ413, 1987 911
Gone: 2xM35A2c, Unimog 404S, Hanomag AL28, DKW Munga

User avatar
svramselaar
Major
Major
Posts: 1109
Joined: December 30th, 2007, 6:48 am
Location: holland

Re: the "miracle" venturi

Unread post by svramselaar » April 20th, 2008, 3:39 am

hello
horst

my opinion on the modification is
the airflow in the venturi is a litle restrickted by the pipe
therefore the air is going faster trow the venturi (the engine wil have the same amound of air )
than you gets a higher sucktion on the main jet (more petrol )
thads wat i think thad is happening
i maybe am wrong on this :oops:
were is the pipe air in the inside carb come against :?:

george

User avatar
rickf
General
General
Posts: 19764
Joined: November 26th, 2007, 1:28 pm
Location: Pemberton, NJ.

Re: the "miracle" venturi

Unread post by rickf » April 20th, 2008, 7:26 pm

I just can't see any advantage there. As George said, where does the emulsion come in? A venturi has to be concentric to work efficiently, That is far from concentric! They did not even clean up the weld.
Rick
1964 M151A1
1984 M1008
1967 M416
04/1952 M100
12/1952 M100- Departed
AN/TSQ-114A Trailblazer- Gone

halftracknut
Brigadier General
Brigadier General
Posts: 2068
Joined: December 11th, 2007, 2:28 pm

Re: the "miracle" venturi

Unread post by halftracknut » April 20th, 2008, 8:38 pm

Hey Rick, My Dad was a mechanic all his life and every time I tied something custom on a car or engine he always said: " son if the factory had wanted like that they would have made it that way"...... :lol:....... Cessna had an AD afew years ago on the 2 piece venturi, FAA said take it out and replace with 1 piece (engine never did run as well) if they were worried about it failing and being sucked into engine, i for sure would not use a welded one.....good luck with that....
slowest mutt east of the missippi..

Floyd
Captain
Captain
Posts: 1043
Joined: December 6th, 2007, 11:26 am
Location: Oak Hills, CA

Re: the "miracle" venturi

Unread post by Floyd » April 20th, 2008, 11:35 pm

Horst: You're a pilot! You can see the answer to that one.

Floyd
1961 M151
1967 M416
1988 M35A2C
VFW Life Member
NRA Life Member

User avatar
Horst
Colonel
Colonel
Posts: 1962
Joined: December 9th, 2007, 6:21 am
Location: Munich, Germany

Re: the "miracle" venturi

Unread post by Horst » April 21st, 2008, 4:25 pm

This is how it looks installed. That picture is taken in the polished carb I tried last year, but for some reason it would not even start with this one. As I could not figure out why, I used another take-out, late model (emission-type) carb. Still shows the location of that second tube.
Image
Adding to the comments above I would say that any stock, high volume production part is a compromise between performance and cost. And I think I know how carburetors work, but you never stop learning something new. That's why I tried this one. I think most will agree that the Zenith is doing it's job ok, but it is not the best carburetor design and you can feel that there is more potential in the engine but both the intake and exhaust designs are everything but good flowing.
Horst

1972 USMC M151A2 w/ROPS (ex Barstow) and M416
1962 M201 and trailer
1966 GTO,1982 E350 Skoolie, 1987 SJ413, 1987 911
Gone: 2xM35A2c, Unimog 404S, Hanomag AL28, DKW Munga

User avatar
rickf
General
General
Posts: 19764
Joined: November 26th, 2007, 1:28 pm
Location: Pemberton, NJ.

Re: the "miracle" venturi

Unread post by rickf » April 21st, 2008, 6:48 pm

I can't see that being anything more than a restriction. It is not near the emulsion tube or idle circuit. It is not taperd. What would it's purpose be? The intake is not a bad design, if you don't count the mounting. The exhaust manifold is a joke!
Rick
1964 M151A1
1984 M1008
1967 M416
04/1952 M100
12/1952 M100- Departed
AN/TSQ-114A Trailblazer- Gone

halftracknut
Brigadier General
Brigadier General
Posts: 2068
Joined: December 11th, 2007, 2:28 pm

Re: the "miracle" venturi

Unread post by halftracknut » April 22nd, 2008, 7:37 am

Rick, I saw a picture somewhere of an exhaust header on a 151 head. Have you seen this? The guy milled the head and built a custom header, I think it was on the mutt motor pool site...check it out...HTN...
slowest mutt east of the missippi..

User avatar
raymond
Major General
Major General
Posts: 3426
Joined: November 26th, 2007, 8:29 pm
Location: God's country, Clarksville Mo.

Re: the "miracle" venturi

Unread post by raymond » April 22nd, 2008, 9:14 am

I always thought it might be interesting to add a second outlet to a standard exhaust manifold. Probably not as good as a header, but a much easier modification.
Raymond


"On the day when crime puts on the apparel of innocence, through a curious reversal peculiar to our age, it is innocence that is called on to justify itself." Albert Camus

User avatar
svramselaar
Major
Major
Posts: 1109
Joined: December 30th, 2007, 6:48 am
Location: holland

Re: the "miracle" venturi

Unread post by svramselaar » April 23rd, 2008, 4:50 am

hello

for the exhuost manifold look at the m151 site from ron rietfors
google for it

greetings george

Post Reply